Solution:

The minimal value for UID and GID has to be changed.

if you do not know your ID  then execute

cat /etc/passwd |grep [USERNAME]
[USERNAME]:x:500:500:XXX,,,:/home/[USERNAME]:/bin/bash

• The third field is the user identifier, the number that the operating system uses for internal purposes. It does not have to be unique.[*]
• The fourth field is the group identifier. This number identifies the primary group of the user; all files that are created by this user may initially be accessible to this group.[*]

Your current UID and GID have to be set as UID_MIN and GID_MIN in etc/login.defs

sudo gedit  /etc/login.defs
# Min/max values for automatic uid selection in useradd
UID_MIN             500

# Min/max values for automatic gid selection in groupadd
GID_MIN             500

Everything should work after re-login or reboot.

Solution:
Execute the sql query. The parameter has to be the name of table that was changed.
REORG TABLE <NAME OF TABLE>

I have installed package that contains this library  after that It works for me.

and run application ./chrome –enable-plugins

So, the grails has predefined place for storing Spring configurations it’s /grails-app/spring. The grails affords two formats for defining beans. It’s standard (well-known) xml format and you can define beans by using groovy syntax. The name of spring configuration also is defined it’s resources.groovy or/and resources.xml. It’s not mistake that I’ve written or/and as you can use both of this format in same time/I think it’s useful think. Moreover, those files share the bean configurations. Another world you can use the bean that was defined in resources.groovy for making references in resources.xml, but not vice versa.

It looks like:

resources.groovy

beans = {

resources.xml

<bean name="testString3" class="java.lang.String">
<constructor-arg ref="testString1"/>
</bean>


It was strange that my favorite IDE (Intelij Idea) doesn’t have normal functionalities for running integration test for Grails application. I understand that it’s not problems of Grails application It’s just probably the guys from Idea doesn’t see any reason for implementing one. But it’s more disadvantage for Grails then for IDEA.
After googling this problem I have found some workaround. The guys from Grails advise to run like

mvn grails:exec -Dcommand=test-app -Dargs="-integration"

Hence, it should be created mvn run configuration in IDEA with goal

grails:exec -Dcommand=test-app -Dargs="-integration"

but unfortunatelly it doesn’t perfect work for me as it runs unit and integration test. Let’s go further. the time for running two really simple test takes about 31 seconds. Come on…it’s awful the integration testing unbelievable slow. Moreover, I can run only one test from test case it’s awful..

As a result that I can say about integration testing. it’s developed like possibility that will use on (pre-)production environment for tracking application before deploying. But it’s really bad for test-driven development.

jad: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Solution:
ftp://mirror.switch.ch/pool/1/mirror/opensuse/distribution/11.0/repo/oss/suse/x86_64/compat-32bit-2008.5.6-6.1.x86_64.rpm should be installed

The next challenging was happened after starting stardict (version 3.0.1) application It didn’t start. It was freeze on start stage and of course nothing in the log . The suspicion falls on esound conflicts. It was desided  to make first step to stun my stardict instalationby some trick.

su

cd /usr/lib64/stardict/plugins

mv stardict_espeak.so stardict_espeak.so.bak

and start stardict again .  HE IS ALIVE

So general argue was about sponsor’s role . What is man contribution in project he should make  and  his level of involvement. So it was accepted that he just brought  money to project and he’ll care only about output.

Other argue was about executive’s role.  Should he be inventor or he should only care about project on high level? it should be just acceptance of starting and accepting of budget for project. So it was accepted that he would control high level of project and we don’t concentrate on who is inventor.

After finding consensus we have discussed and merged in all our communication plans . Also it was made some remark about ground rules for stakeholder , so it should be our next task….

1.Stakeholders

Executives and Sponsors (ES) This class of stakeholders includes all project sponsors.

Core Team members (CT) This class of stakeholders includes project managers group, research group, developer group, tester group and data domain’s support group.

2. Formal Project Communication

Formal project communications will consist of project plan update, written status reports and project team meetings. All communications and workflow have to be in English. The all written communications and workflow will be distributed via project repository on project blog.

1. 1. Weekly project plan update

      Media/Tools – All plans published in MS Word 2000 in project repository

   2. Weekly status report

      Media/Tools – All plans published in MS Word 2000 in project repository

   3. Weekly core team meeting

Ground rules – the duration of meeting has to be not more than 30 min

1. 1. Decade Core team meeting

Ground rules – the duration of meeting has to be not more than 1 h

Informal Project Communication

Informal project communication includes phone calls , email ans informal face to face converstation.